In a busy week that included a radio interview during which
he tried to defend and excuse the racial slurs made by Joe Mascia about several
African American political and civic leaders, Carl Paladino also had time to
dash off a few inflammatory emails to Board of Education President Jim Sampson
and myself.
On July 29th, Paladino angrily responded to an
email request I sent to the Interim Superintendent. Accusing me of ordering the Superintendent to
take action on an item, he wrote:
“Your order was phrased as a question. Time for you to answer to the
community for your maligned and arrogant attempts to destroy the charter system
which serves over 9,000 Buffalo kids with a quality education that they would
never get in the BPS. If you were really
about the kids you would advocate to disassemble the BPS and give every kid a
voucher to choose where he or she would be best educated. But no, you won’t because that would not sit
well with your pledge of loyalty to Crystal Barton and Phil Rumore both of whom
endorsed and supported your election. The charter schools have long waiting
lists of applicants. Those parents have
the wisdom to not be led blindly by people like you, Cottman, Thiggs (sic) and
the other thug activists who seek to protect the unions and maintain your
empowerment. There is no other logic to
your position.” Paladino ended
this ridiculous attack with a sophomoric insult. “Who ties your shoes for you?”
Although disrespectful and nonsensical the contents of this
email pale in comparison to one(s) that were sent the following day to Mr.
Sampson. The call for a special board
meeting to address the required Office of Civil Rights response and the
transportation issue for the Charter School for Applied Technology, elicited
the following tirade:
“Jim, I will not attend that meeting because I will not vote on either
issue until we have appointed a Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent and replaced
you with Larry Quinn as President of the Board so as to closely monitor the new
Superintendent.”
The email continues with an assault on Mr. Sampson’s
leadership competency and his failure to keep Mr. Paladino informed. Paladino asks, “Where did you ever get the idea
that you could tell me what to do or ignore me.” The subject of a new Superintendent
candidate, Dr. Kriner Cash, is raised several times throughout this email. “I am willing to hear Cash out only because
he comes highly recommended and only if he is agreeable to the appointment of
Eberle as operating Deputy and an immediate restructuring of the executive
staff as guided by the Board majority.
The idea of bringing in a black only to pacify the black minority on the
Board is abhorrent to me……If Kriner Cash is acceptable he can be Superintendent
only with Eberle appointed as Deputy Superintendent in complete charge of day
to day operations of the district with the Weimer team for the non-receivership
schools with Cash responsible for the receivership schools and the
implementation of our reform agenda. If
Cash is not acceptable, then Eberle must be appointed as Superintendent with
the Weimer team.”
The substance of these emails is troubling, particularly the
one to Mr. Sampson. Mr. Paladino is
clear that (1) he intends to force the hiring of his hand-picked Superintendent
candidate. He is even willing to
negotiate the hiring of Black man to be a figurehead if necessary (2) he wants
the current executive team fired, immediately and replaced by a group he calls
the “Weimer Team”. There’s no concern
about the destabilization resulting from the abrupt removal of staff, who are
currently working on all the plans for school turnaround and initiating a new
school year. There is no consideration
of the havoc these changes would create for our students. The Paladino demands and ultimatums should be
viewed further from several vantage points:
(1)
They reflect an arrogance and disregard for the
legal limits of the authority of an individual Board member: per Board By-Laws 1110 (Education Law
Sections 2551-2554):
Members of the Board of Education have legal authority for
the conduct of the District schools only when acting as a body, by majority
vote, in a properly convened session.
Board members acting as individuals have no authority over
school affairs or school
personnel. The Board will not be bound in any way by any
individual's statement or action unless the Board, through adopted policy or by
majority vote, has delegated this authority to the individual member.
(2)
They constitute a pattern of intimidation and bullying
of individuals, which have culminated in numerous law suits, instituted by Mr.
Paladino or against him. These legal
cases predominantly impact Black women. The District has and continues to spend
hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.
(3)
The pattern of intimidation, however, now
extends to anyone who refuses to agree with Mr. Paladino or follow his
directives. Mr. Ogilvie, for example,
experienced similar intimidation when Mr. Paladino confronted him and ordered
him to submit his resignation.
(4)
The exclusion of the minority board members from
governance responsibility is deliberate and serves to disenfranchise them and
their constituents
This email is also a stunning example of privilege. Otherwise, who would include State Education
Commissioner MaryEllen Elia and Dr. Kriner Cash as recipients of an email that
proposes such improprieties except someone who believes he does not have to
follow the same dictates as other people? Does “accountability” only apply to
our students, our teachers, our administrators and some Board members?
It’s time for Mr. Paladino to be held accountable for his
actions. He has acted willfully outside
of his authority as a Board member and clearly has been acting in this manner
for some time. The minority members have written a letter to
the Commissioner calling for Mr. Paladino’s removal from the Board. Others are
joining us and writing their own letters.
We need the Commissioner to hear from the community and to know that
this behavior will not continue to be tolerated.
(New York State Commissioner of Education MaryEllen Elia; 89
Washington Avenue; Albany, NY 12234)
Read
the full text of the Paladino email to James Sampson and the letter to
Commissioner Elia, here
We're not really sure what the problem is here. What havoc can possibly be created from making positive changes toward actually educating our children instead of militantly maintaining the status quo, as the minority on the board and their enablers in the BTF would like to do? The status quo is a history of failure.
ReplyDeleteCan it get any more "destabilized" than it already is? Embracing positive change instead of fighting it will only elevate your stature as problem solvers. Right now, you just look like obstructionists, obviously unwilling to admit your mistakes of the past
If you're not sure what the problem is here then you are part of the problem. "Status quo" is not desired by any one. The "change" the Carl Paladino advocates for IS status quo.
DeleteThe rhetoric of failure that you are so quick to parrot is by design. Why is the failure least present among the sons and daughters of the wealthy? That's by design.
The state's stranglehold on curriculum and assessment is what perpetuates status quo and thus "failure".
Real advocates of change discuss curriculum and assessment, not charter schools, vouchers and other red-herrings.