On July 1st, the Buffalo School Board convened
for its annual organizational meeting swearing in two new members and a new
President and, presumably ushering in a new era with a New Majority Majority
membership. Actually we didn’t have to
wait long to learn what is being planned for the new era. In fact, in less than 24 hours newly elected
President James Sampson issued a six page paper entitled “A Vision for Buffalo
Public Education”. While Sampson stated
in his accompanying email that he hoped the piece would “guide our discussions
and decision making over the coming year”, two things are clear: (1) the publication of this “vision” came as
a complete surprise to at least four members of the Board, and (2) it was
obviously something that has been in the works for some time. The introduction is peppered throughout with
references to “we”. For example, one
statement notes that “what we imagine for the BPSD over the next five years is
the transition to a robust portfolio of high performing schools….”. In another section, Sampson states that “Our
guiding principle will be that effective teaching counts the most.” This raises questions as to who the “we” are
and who wrote this or contributed to this “vision for Buffalo public
education”.
My response to Mr. Sampson shortly after receiving the
“Vision” statement and reading it is as follows:
“I’ve read your vision
statement. It’s comprehensive and certainly offers many issues/concerns
for discussion as you suggest. Given that this was developed without the
full input of Board members, I expect that the opportunity for discussion,
indeed healthy debate, will be forthcoming. If all Board members are to
feel included, have their ideas respected and believe that all can have input
into the final vision statement, then I expect you will want feedback in
various forms, e.g. written, verbal and I look forward to the dialogue
beginning immediately. “
Mr. Sampson’s response to me was quick and concise:
“Of course”, he said.
Ms. Belton-Cottman’s response to the Sampson document was
even more pointed. She asked:
“Since you have
advocated for "good governance" and "transparency"....
please explain who the term "we" used in this document defines or
represents and when and how this consensus was derived? Also since you
have set an agenda or your vision, without all elected parties being involved
you are ultimately saying by issuing this statement that you really don't care
because you have secured the votes required to move your agenda. Is this
the reason why the job for interim has not been posted? So are the
"we" making an appointment of interim superintendent next week, at
the meeting without proper vetting or respect of the other elected
officials. I believe under good governance and transparency, the board
members not included in the "we" deserve to be equally informed.” (Reprinted
with permission)
Over the next few weeks, I will share with the readers, the
principal elements of this “Vision” statement.
It covers five strategies that Mr. Sampson believes the District needs
to undertake: (1) Parent and Student
Choice (2) Structural Alignment (3) New Deal for Teachers (4) Interim
Superintendent (5) Engaging Stakeholders.
Each of these is muti-level with numerous proposed action steps.
To be clear, I want to state that in each of the articles I
write, I am expressing my personal opinion, but that opinion is bolstered by
extensive knowledge and research of the educational issues being
addressed. I believe that the community
should be aware of the major proposals contained within Mr. Sampson’s “Vision”
as they are intended to chart the direction of the Buffalo School District. In fact, it is critically important that
members of the community be informed about these proposed vision statements as
the future of our school district will be impacted. YOU SHOULD/MUST BE ENGAGED IN THE DISCUSSION
that forms the decisions regarding our schools.
No comments:
Post a Comment