Don’t lose sight of the forest for the trees. It Should be About the Children! If we applied talk about “transparency,
openness and honesty” to the expression of disrespect and disregard by some
Board members, we would find the evidence of such behavior written all over
their faces. Our students have noticed
it, brought it to our attention and frankly been the example for mature
behavior that the adults have only given lip service to. As one student observed last Wednesday night,
“I’ve seen board members sit and tap their pens and be on their phones and I
realize that if the same behavior was to be executed by me or one of my
classmates, we would be considered low performing”. Pan to the Board table to find one Board
member texting on his phone as he ignored the young man’s words. Go to YouTube if you don’t believe me.
Last week the distribution of a two flyers depicting all the
Board members and others by racist, derogatory and demeaning caricatures
ignited a firestorm that has threatened to eclipse the real issues that the
Board should be addressing. Really? Should
anyone be surprised that something of this sort would happen? For nearly two years one board member has
been referring to the African American women, on the staff and board, as
“clueless, incompetent, idiot, sisterhood” and probably much worse than that in
private. Furthermore, a recent email from
Mr. Paladino to the civil rights consultant, who is studying the problem of
equity in our District and suggested delaying the decision to hand over our
schools, warned him to “Stay out of our way”.
These and other actions by this board member have invited this sort of
“nonsense”. Flyer Gate.
The timing of the release of these anonymously produced
flyers is questionable. But one thing
that we should understand is that while the focus is on this piece, we are distracted
from the very important issue of what happens to four “out-of-time” schools and
the students, who are currently enrolled in them. Even as the Board “debates” the merits of
school developed redesigns and charter-school take over, one Board member,
Larry Quinn recently visited Bennett High School and met with staff to outline
their future. I spoke to staff members, who were present
during this meeting and asked that their names be withheld, but confirmed that
Mr. Quinn promised the following: The
charter schools would take ownership of Bennett; Mr. Ogilvie will be leaving
his position by April 1st; and a new Superintendent from the ranks
of current principals has already been selected by the Board majority. Does this sound like there will be a fair and
reasoned assessment of the redesign plans as compared to the charter schools
take-over? It doesn't seem likely. And nothing was said about the fate of the
students at Bennett. It Should be About
the Children!
In the midst of the discussion of whether the vote will be
to maintain Buffalo Schools for Buffalo students or give those schools to
“public”, but privately run charters, there is a question of Mr. Paladino’s
conflict of interest. At the charter
school presentations, I made a point of asking each for the identity of their
landlord. In two of the three cases,
Tapestry and Health Sciences, the response was “Ellicott Development”. CSAT also has a relationship with a
subsidiary of Ellicott Development at its Hertel Avenue site. Having free space should free up funding that
would have a positive impact on the budget of these charters, which includes
tens of thousands of dollars in lease payments to Ellicott Development. Mr.
Paladino maintains that he does not have a conflict and will vote to approve
the charter requests. Even reference to
the Board’s Ethics Policy does not deter Mr. Paladino from his stated plan.
It Should be About the Children! The school redesign teams have worked to
develop credible, student centered, innovative plans to keep these schools
open, thriving and serving Buffalo Public Schools children. Mr. Ogilvie, Interim Superintendent, has
proposed that the Board take time to develop a comprehensive plan that would
include current plans to expand Emerson School of Hospitality and the opening
of a Newcomer’s Academy for new arrivals to this country. The State has given the District the
flexibility to start the redesigned school programs in September 2016, which
would allow time for thoughtful and rationale “tweaking” of the programs if
necessary including considering the report of the civil rights expert.
LET’S MAKE IT ABOUT THE CHILDREN! Voice your objections to the plan to turn
over Bennett, School 39 or East High School to the charter schools. Our children deserve to have a Board of
Education that considers the impact of these decisions on them and does not use
rhetoric about “34,000 poor failing children” as a smoke screen to “dis-assemble”
this school district.
Why was Paladino even allowed to run for the Buffalo School Board when he has a vested interest in Charter Schools? We think of children as bullies, he is one of the biggest adult bullies around!
ReplyDeleteFor all you folks that like quantitative data(statisitics) rather than qualitative data(how people feel), here you go.
ReplyDeleteElmwood Village Charter school has approximately 300 students. The greatest majority is White. 44% of their students receive subsidized lunch assistance.
Community Charter School and Enterprise Charter School is mostly black, no White students attend. Nearly 100% of their students receive subsidized lunch.
There is a direct correlation related to income and poverty factors that can't be denied. It clearly reflects that a greater majority of students do better, Black or White, if they attend a diverse school.
If the school board really wants to help, they will support initiatives and programs that better assist students with limited resources. I find it highly offensive that many of our political leaders are keeping quite and making no attempt to file any type of injunctions to stop this school board from violating the civil and constitutional rights of children. You fail them, you always have, and I guess you always will. They can't speak for themselves, but some are clearly mature enough to do so(as evidenced by student statements at BOE meeting). The US Constitution protects them too, and they have not relinquished their rights under the constitution related to their age. Public education belongs to the children. Not a corporation, not a board, not special interest and not Governor Cuomo.
Now, We voted for our elected officials to represent our issues and interests. Get to work, because you all know this is wrong. And you all know you can do more to represent these children! Please be their voice! Do you all really think the community wants to take civil action against our state? Do you really think we want to raise money and or file our own lawsuit against the state? Who has bargaining power? Who can compromise? Who will lay it all on the line for the children, even if it means such a bold move can make this your last run? Who can live with potentially a 2-4 year run in public office, but knowing you did the right thing? Who?
I agree with both of the people above. Katrinna Martin's comments are right on! I would only add that students do better when the school setting is diverse both racially and economically.
ReplyDeleteYour reference in the first paragraph to the disrespect and disregard for others of the anti-public education cronies reminds me, Barbara, of back in the day, Surely you remember when Dave Kelly and Jim Comerford would chat with each other while parents were speaking to the board. They could not have been more rude and disdainful at the time. I can't imagine what they'd be like now with their cell phones!
I also agree with you Amy. One of my biggest points is related to income diversity. That's why I noted the subsidized lunch eligibility at the 3 schools. Where the collective student body has a diverse income, all children do better.
ReplyDeleteSo what if we produce A+ students, if we haven't taught social justice, tolerance and equity. I'll take a C or D student on my team if they have character, imagination and drive.