On December 10th, New York State Education
Commissioner, Dr. John B. King, Jr. announced his resignation. Dr. King revealed that he was joining the
U.S. Department of Education as a Senior Advisor to Education Secretary Arne
Duncan. To some the Commissioner’s
decision signals concern and reason to worry about the future of education in
the Buffalo Public Schools. To others, like
me, King’s departure is a hopeful sign that the tyrannical, unreasonable and
questionable mandates forced on the District under his administration will
cease and the District will, instead, experience a new era during which a more
collaborative relationship with SED can be developed that will support our
efforts to improve the educational outcomes of our students.
It’s obvious that Dr. King has his supporters, but he also
has many critics and not just those of us in Buffalo, who disagreed with him
and questioned the motivation of the State Education Department in its dealings
with our District. After all if one
looks at other urban Districts in the State, especially Rochester and Syracuse,
the questions have to be asked why these Districts, which have graduation rates
and student proficiency scores below Buffalo’s, escaped the targeted attention
that we’ve received. In fact it was
puzzling that the Commissioner should cite a remark dropped by a former Board
member years ago that the “Commissioner was picking on Buffalo”. It surprised me that as recently as this
year, Dr. King admonished us for being whiners and making excuses as he again
used this remark to punctuate his claim.
He especially singled out the minority Board members as examples of the
whiner/excuses group while praising the new majority for having a vision and
reform agenda that aligned with his.
Throughout my tenure on the Board the relationship with Dr.
King has been strained (that’s putting it mildly). Productive communication with the
Commissioner has been non-existent and the District has been subjected to
mandate after mandate with little time to respond to complicated demands with
dire consequences for non-compliance. There
are numerous situations that I can recount as examples of this treatment but
for the purposes of this article, I will only cite the appointment of the
Distinguished Educator.
In June 2012 just before the appointment of Dr. Pamela Brown
as the new Buffalo Schools Superintendent, Commissioner King named Dr. Judy Elliott
as the Distinguished Educator to the District.
Per his letter to the Buffalo Board of Education, the Commissioner said
Dr. Elliott “is considered a consultant to the Buffalo City School District and
her services will be a charge upon the district. Among her other
responsibilities Dr. Elliott will conduct an intensive review of district and
school systems, structures, and operations and develop an action plan outlining
goals and objectives for the ensuing school year that is focused on addressing
the needs of the Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools and Priority Schools in
the District. She will also serve as an ex-officio, non-voting member of the
board of education.” Oh, and by the
way, it’s the law. This appointment was
made without the courtesy of prior notification or consultation with the Board
or Dr. Brown.
During her tenure, Dr. Elliott has developed action plans
but it remains to be seen what improvement has resulted from this work. In fact, given the continued pressure on the
District during her term one would have to conclude that Dr. Elliott has not
helped the District to improve its priority and focus schools. Dr. Elliott was appointed for a third term in
June 2014. It should be noted that
evaluation of Dr. Elliott’s performance is the purview of the
Commissioner. However, as with her
appointment the Board has never been consulted regarding her performance and as
a matter of fact no evaluation has been shared or made public by the
Commissioner. What does this say about accountability
for someone who earns $190 an hour plus expenses, amassing a salary close to that of the
Superintendent? Oh, and did I mention
that Buffalo is the only District with a Distinguished Educator? Rochester doesn’t’ have one. Syracuse doesn’t have one.
Will Dr. King be missed?
Most certainly. Should we be
worried? Not in the least. His legacy,
not just in Buffalo but across this state is one of oppressive mandates,
seemingly personal petty politics, failure to dialogue with parents and other
stakeholders, insistence on imposing the
Common CORE and incessant standardized testing tied to teacher evaluation and
other “reforms” that have not been
validated. The results, however, have
been detrimental to the educational system statewide. So as
Dr. King exits the State Education Department and the Regents begins a national
search, we must be vigilant to demand that the next Commissioner provide the
open, transparent and honest interaction that has been demanded of us.
Note: As previously stated the opinions expressed
in these columns are my personal views and are not intended to represent the
views of the Buffalo Board of Education.
No comments:
Post a Comment